There is ample evidence that some courts misunderstand their gatekeeping function in screening the reliability of expert testimony. Numerous decisions have held – contrary to the text of Federal Rule of Evidence 702 – that problems with the basis of an expert’s testimony or the application of an expert’s methodology are issues of weight rather than admissibility.
Read the full article here.
Need any tips on protecting your company's data? Please watch the below webinar hosted by Lucas Beal. Should you have any questions or...
With the expansion of cryptocurrency and the opportunities to capitalize on its growth, there has been a recent flurry of sponsors...
The New York State Commissioner of Health (“Commissioner”) has extended the designation of COVID-19 as a “highly contagious communicable...
Comentários